Legal Updates

In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, Congress passed the Families First Coronavirus Response Act and the President signed it into law on March 18, 2020.  As part of the economic stimulus plan, the Act contains a number of provisions that may affect companies’ sick leave.  The Act applies to an[...]
― READ MORE

Following the Michigan Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Bazzi v Sentinel Ins Co, lower courts were given the vague mandate to “balance the equities” between innocent defrauded insurance companies and innocent injured third-party claimants when a policy is rescinded.  Some courts responded by [...]
― READ MORE

In a recent unpublished opinion, the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed summary disposition for an insurer, finding that the insurer was entitled to rescind an insurance policy based on the insured’s misrepresentation regarding her employment in the application for insurance. In Erica Kelley v [...]
― READ MORE

In a recent unpublished decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed summary disposition for the defendant no-fault insurer. The Court examined three issues on appeal: (1) whether a no-fault priority defense is an affirmative defense that must be asserted in a responsive pleading; (2) whether th[...]
― READ MORE

The Michigan Court of Appeals recently issued a published opinion in Board of County Road Commissioners for the County of Washtenaw v Shankle, which will significantly impact utilities in Michigan, increasing both the cost of acquiring property rights and the risk of owners successfully challenging [...]
― READ MORE

Late last year, the Michigan Legislature enacted the Small Wireless Communications Facilities Deployment Act (the “Act”), which will have a significant impact on municipalities’ ability to collect fees for new technology added to utility poles. The Act purports to streamline Michigan’s ro[...]
― READ MORE

In a recent unpublished opinion, the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed summary disposition for the defendant insurer where the claimant misrepresented her abilities at her deposition, but later admitted that she had lied. In Marija Sabados v State Farm Mut Auto Ins Co., the plaintiff filed suit [...]
― READ MORE

The Michigan Court of Appeals recently offered a reminder that Requests for Admission are meant to save resources by limiting the issues in dispute, and are not a means to litigate the merits of a party’s claims. In Malusi v Farm Bureau General Ins Co of Michigan, the plaintiff was struck by a [...]
― READ MORE

In a recent opinion, the United States District Court for the Central District of California held that the aircraft exclusion commonly found in commercial general liability policies unambiguously applied to exclude coverage for bodily injuries caused by a drone. In Philadelphia Indemnity Insuranc[...]
― READ MORE

In a recent published decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals confirmed that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is available to prove a circumstantial case of negligence based on a premises liability theory. The plaintiff in Pugno v Blue Harvest Farms, LLC, an air compressor technician, was visiti[...]
― READ MORE